I will take the finance secretary at his word when he says that the decision to resign was his own. However, reading between the lines, it is clear that he was pressured to leave because of his differences with the leadership at the ministry. This unjustifiable pressure that is all too common in Nepali state of affairs, so much so that people have grown accustomed to, is very disruptive and detrimental to long-term planning and policy implementation, not to mention the economic health of the nation. This incident highlights what the political tradition in Nepal has been and continues to be. The system is brutal to people that are qualified but do not necessarily share the minister’s viewpoint. Pressure to resign and transfers to different districts (saruwa) of qualified individuals, when the government changes are not unheard of. In fact, it is expected! This process not only creates inefficiencies in the bureaucratic process but hinders nation’s progress.
What can be done about this? Well, I think this is a problem that is deeply rooted in the system that we have in place. When you have a system that allows unqualified (in terms of training) MPs to become the leaders of ministries that they do not have much understanding of, married with the eminent threat of their government collapsing, one cannot expect anything other than an individual who is interested in maximizing his/her personal interest. So, my solution would be to adopt a new system—a system where the leader of the country has to be elected by the entire nation, a system where the leader has a term requirement and gets to appoint their own cabinet, a system where MPs cannot be the heads of ministries but only represent the constituency that elected them and fight for their cause.
What can be done about this? Well, I think this is a problem that is deeply rooted in the system that we have in place. When you have a system that allows unqualified (in terms of training) MPs to become the leaders of ministries that they do not have much understanding of, married with the eminent threat of their government collapsing, one cannot expect anything other than an individual who is interested in maximizing his/her personal interest. So, my solution would be to adopt a new system—a system where the leader of the country has to be elected by the entire nation, a system where the leader has a term requirement and gets to appoint their own cabinet, a system where MPs cannot be the heads of ministries but only represent the constituency that elected them and fight for their cause.
Yup! Sad but true fact about Nepalese political situation. According to one source, real story behind the scene is few big business houses had bribed FM against the finance secy. Apparently, there were conflicts on going ahead with the investigation of fake vat bills. Regarding changing our system or even representing every one in the constitution, I guess, those individuals elected by "entire" nation will be affiliated to a political party and that too centralized in Kathmandu. Again, which are backed (read pumped)by "invisible fists" of rich ones.
ReplyDeleteThe time couldn't be more appropriate to bring ideas such as these to public attention as the constitution is being written. Having said that, there are numerous posts that are politically appointed even now and they don't seem to be working all that great either.
ReplyDelete@ PO Solutions: Thank you for engaging in this discussion. I think that if the entire nation gets to vote for their leader, it will decentralize the power. Also, it will force the leader/wannabes to think about policies to impact the entire country, not just Kathmandu, Biratnagar , etc. They may be affiliated with a party but anyone could become the leader elected by the people—think primaries in the U.S. So, possibly, Gagan Thapa or any other leader could run and become the leaders and would not have to please their party elites!
ReplyDelete@ Prayash: Thank you for your comment. I agree with you that this is the right time to bring these issues forward for discussion. I am writing another polished piece for publication on other blogs/newspapers to get people to, at least, think about it--will be done soon. Your concern about the current political appointments is valid. Although, I think it actually validates my point of needing a newer system. The current appointments are, in most cases, made for personal reasons or animosity against another party. And, most importantly, the appointed individual knows that they have a short window to maximize their benefit—provide jobs for friends/relatives/party loyalists—you name it. We need to change this process/cycle.
If the nationally elected leader has a term limit and gets to appoint the cabinet members (not everyone down the bureaucratic hierarchy) AND if the MPs are not allowed to hold top offices while being a part of the legislature, then we may be able to increase accountability and efficiency.
Shrochis Karki provides a good analysis of the various other issues and the ones I hinted towards. Good read. Here is the link: http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=29836
ReplyDelete